Iran News and Events Active Duty Military Army Navy Air Force Marines Coast Guard Reserves Veterans
|
Active Duty
|
Iran Prepares for War 07/01/08
Russia Warns U.S. Against Striking Iran
Israel to take out Iran's Nuke Facilities? Israeli Second Strike Planned Iranian Border Grab Incident
Shihab I & II Missile & Satellite Launch Program
Operation Iran Freedom/Preparing for War Country Analysis Brief Music News Media Sources
Iran News Pars Times (Iran) Iran's Nuclear Program/Facilities Iran/Afghanistan Link Web Sites Inside Iran
Copied from:DEBKAfile Iran Va Jahan and Israel National Radio Iranian Culture Map
Satellite Photos of the Middle East Weather Data Iran Weather Satellite of Middle East Buy Iran Topo Maps
Iran Views Al Qaeda - Terrorism Terrorist Group Profiles FBI Anti-Terrorism Page Images from Tehran, Iran
Articles:
- Al Qaeda Busy in Iran Background Info - Persian VS Arab?
- Bush Weighs Effort To Undermine Iranian Leadership
- The Road To A Nuclear Iran
- Iran's secret nuclear sites
- Iran Hides Two Big Nuclear Facilities – Subcontracts for North Korea
For more - go to: Iran va Jahan
American investors in Bahrain advised to
pack up business operations and leave
March 30, 2007, 3:56 PM (GMT+02:00)
|
|
|
|
|
|
USS Nimitz nuclear carrier |
|
|
|
|
|
The advice came from officers with US Central Command 5th Fleet HQ at Manama, who spoke of security tension, a hint at an approaching war with Iran. Arab sources report the positioning of a Patriot anti-missile battery in Bahrain this week; they say occupancy at emirate hotels has soared past 90% due mostly to the influx of US military personnel. They also report Western media crews normally employed in military coverage are arriving in packs.
Thursday, March 29, Gen. Khaled al-‘Absi, Bahrain’s chief of air defense operations disclosed that new alarm networks had been installed and air defense systems upgraded to handle chemical, biological and radioactive attacks.
The USS Nimitz and its support ships will be departing San Diego Monday, April 2, to join the John C. Stennis Strike Group in the Persian Gulf. The nuclear carrier is due to relieve the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower , but military sources in the Gulf believe all three US carriers will stay put if tensions continue to climb or if fighting breaks out involving American, British and Iranian forces.
The mighty American armada is further supported by the USS Bataan and USS Boxer strike groups.
War tensions have been triggered most recently by the crisis over the seized British sailors and large-scale US sea, air and amphibious exercises in the Gulf.
1. DEBKAfile’s Tehran sources report that in the contest within the Iranian leadership over how to handle the affair of the captured British seamen, the wildest radical element has gained the upper hand, reducing the prospects of their imminent release. Heading the tough Tehran faction are hardline president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Gen. Rahim Safavi, commander of the Revolutionary Guards whose naval wing performed the seizure.
They gained strength from the British premier Tony Blair’s initial passive, semi-conciliatory response. Tehran quickly grasped it had acquired not just a propaganda tool but a military asset, which the UK cannot match as long as the Americans desist from throwing their military might into the fray. Washington has refused to risk of a full-scale war confrontation with the Revolutionary Guards for the sake of the British sailors.
Iranian strategists also registered that, although the Blair government has begun moving mountains to gain the freedom of the marine crew held in Tehran, London appeared fairly laid back about the kidnap of BBC correspondent Alan Johnston in broad daylight by gunmen in Palestinian Gaza, although three weeks had gone by.
Revolutionary Guards serving with Palestinian terrorist groups in Gaza no doubt filed a full report on the Johnston case to Tehran, which drew its own conclusions.
2. Taking part in the big demonstration of American naval, air and marine force launched March 27 are the two nuclear carrier strike forces Stennis and Eisenhower , thousands of marines and 100 warplanes. Maneuvers on this scale in the tight, overcrowded waters of the Persian Gulf carry risks of a collision between American and Iranian craft.
DEBKAfile’s military sources report that the Nimitz group is composed of the Princeton guided-missile cruiser, four guided missile destroyers – the Higgins , Chafee , John Paul Jones and Pinckney . The strike force is armed with two helicopter squadrons and a special unit for dismantling sea mines and other explosive devices.
Earlier, DEBKAfile quoted intelligence sources in Moscow as predicting that a US strike against Iranian nuclear installations codenamed Operation Bite has been scheduled for April 6 at 0040 hours. Missiles and air raids will conduct strikes designed to be devastating enough to set Tehran’s nuclear program several years back.
MOSCOW, March 27 (RIA Novosti) - Russian military intelligence
services are reporting a flurry of activity by U.S. Armed Forces
near Iran's borders, a high-ranking security source said
Tuesday.
"The latest military intelligence data point to heightened U.S. military preparations for both an air and ground operation against Iran," the official said, adding that the Pentagon has probably not yet made a final decision as to when an attack will be launched. He said the Pentagon is looking for a way to deliver a strike against Iran "that would enable the Americans to bring the country to its knees at minimal cost." He also said the U.S. Naval presence in the Persian Gulf has for the first time in the past four years reached the level that existed shortly before the invasion of Iraq in March 2003. Col.-Gen. Leonid Ivashov, vice president of the Academy of Geopolitical Sciences, said last week that the Pentagon is planning to deliver a massive air strike on Iran's military infrastructure in the near future. A new U.S. carrier battle group has been dispatched to the Gulf. The USS John C. Stennis, with a crew of 3,200 and around 80 fixed-wing aircraft, including F/A-18 Hornet and Superhornet fighter-bombers, eight support ships and four nuclear submarines are heading for the Gulf, where a similar group led by the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower has been deployed since December 2006. The U.S. is also sending Patriot anti-missile systems to the region. |
|
Wed Aug 18, 4:14 PM ET
|
DOHA (AFP) - Iranian Defense Minister Ali Shamkhani warned that Iran might launch a preemptive strike against US forces in the region to prevent an attack on its nuclear facilities.
"We will not sit (with arms folded) to wait for what others will do to us. Some military commanders in Iran are convinced that preventive operations which the Americans talk about are not their monopoly," Shamkhani told Al-Jazeera TV when asked if Iran would respond to an American attack on its nuclear facilities.
"America is not the only one present in the region. We are also present, from Khost to Kandahar in Afghanistan; we are present in the Gulf and we can be present in Iraq (news - web sites)," said Shamkhani, speaking in Farsi to the Arabic-language news channel through an interpreter.
"The US military presence (in Iraq) will not become an element of strength (for Washington) at our expense. The opposite is true, because their forces would turn into a hostage" in Iranian hands in the event of an attack, he said.
Shamkhani, who was asked about the possibility of an American or Israeli strike against Iran's atomic power plant in Bushehr, added: "We will consider any strike against our nuclear installations as an attack on Iran as a whole, and we will retaliate with all our strength.
"Where Israel is concerned, we have no doubt that it is an evil entity, and it will not be able to launch any military operation without an American green light. You cannot separate the two."
A commander of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards was quoted in the Iranian press earlier Wednesday as saying that Tehran would strike the Israeli reactor at Dimona if Israel attacks the Islamic republic's own burgeoning nuclear facilities.
"If Israel fires one missile at Bushehr atomic power plant, it should permanently forget about Dimona nuclear center, where it produces and keeps its nuclear weapons, and Israel would be responsible for the terrifying consequence of this move," General Mohammad Baqer Zolqadr warned.
Iran's controversial bid to generate nuclear power at its plant being built at Bushehr is seen by arch-enemies Israel and the United States as a cover for nuclear weapons development.
The latest comments mark an escalation in an exchange of threats between Israel and Iran in recent weeks, leading to speculation that there may be a repeat of Israel's strike against Iraqi nuclear facilities at Osirak in 1981.
Iran insists that its nuclear intentions are peaceful, while pointing at its enemy's alleged nuclear arsenal, which Israel neither confirms nor denies possessing.
Shamkhani told Al-Jazeera it was not possible "from a practical standpoint" to destroy Iran's nuclear programs because they are the product of national skills "which cannot be eliminated by military means."
He also warned that Iran would consider itself no longer bound by its commitments to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in the event of an attack.
"The execution of such threats (to attack Iran's nuclear installations) would mean that our cooperation with the IAEA led to feeding information about our nuclear facilities to the attacking side, which (in turn) means that we would no longer be bound by any of our obligations" to the nuclear watchdog, he said.
Diplomats said in Vienna Tuesday that the IAEA would not say in a report next month whether Iran's nuclear activities are of a military nature, nor will it recommend bringing the case before the UN Security Council.
The IAEA board is due to deliver the report on Iran's nuclear activities during a meeting at the organization's headquarters in Vienna from September 13 after the last of a group of IAEA inspectors returned from Iran last week.
The UN's nuclear agency is conducting a major probe into Iran's bid to generate electricity through nuclear power.
The Islamic republic has agreed to temporarily suspend uranium enrichment pending the completion of the IAEA probe, but is working on other parts of the fuel cycle and has recently resumed making centrifuges used for enrichment.
Iran-Based Al Qaeda Threat Much Closer than Shehab-3
DEBKAfile Special Analysis
July 22, 2003, 9:30 AM (GMT+02:00)
|
|
|
Mussab Zarqawi - Al Qaeda`s ticking bomb in Iran |
Israel has more cause for concern from the presence of senior al Qaeda operatives in Iran than from the prospect of Iran shooting a Shehab-3 medium-range missile any time soon, despite the handover ceremony Iran’s bellicose spiritual leader Ali Khamenei staged with Iran’s Revolutionary Guards on July 20. According to DEBKAfile’s military experts, the missile is not yet operational; neither is it precise enough or capable of delivering an unconventional warhead. The Shehab-3 will need another two years at least to be ready for service. Only then, will Israel’s anti-missile Arrow missile system be required to live up to the Israeli defense minister Shaul Mofaz’s encomium, that the Arrow is Israel’s answer to the Iranian missile.
Meanwhile, the Shehab-3 is meanwhile grounded by two daunting obstacles:
A. The final version of the missile’s engine is far from complete; tests are still running on various North Korean versions including the Nodong-1 upgraded with Russian technology and Iranian improvements. DEBKAfile’s intelligence sources report that Iranian missile engineers and operators went to North Korea at the end of June to speed delivery of the new engine parts ordered and paid for last year, after the first version engine proved faulty. Some of the missiles test-fired crashed shortly after launch.
While pressing for delivery of the engine parts, Tehran is cocking an anxious ear to the war of words flying between Washington and Pyongyang. Iran’s leaders fear that sooner or later the disputants will come to an understanding over North Korea’s nuclear weapons program rather than letting it slide into outright confrontation. For Iran’s program, this spells curtains in more than one way.
1. The moment North Korea’s nuclear program accepts a regime of controls and limitations, the full blast of international heat, especially from Washington, will veer round to compel the Iranians to fall in line and give up the development of a nuclear bomb.
2. North Korea will be bound under such an agreement by non-proliferation clauses banning the export of nuclear and missile technologies alike. Once the Pyongyang door is slammed, Iran can forget about North Korean assistance in bringing its ballistic missile engines up to scratch. Tehran is therefore racing to get what it can out of North Korea before Pyongyang resoles its dispute with the Washington.
B. The Iranian program faces another major hurdle. Their twin object is to produce enough enriched uranium for the manufacture of nuclear bombs and warheads by the latter half of 2005, also completing the development of dependable engines for their ballistic missiles in the same time frame. If all goes according to plan, Tehran will by that date have a nuclear weapon plus several missiles for delivering it. However, it is hard to imagine the United States and/or Israel allowing the Islamic Republic to reach that point unopposed.
These difficulties place the Shehab-3 menace in the middle distance and bring the Iran-based al Qaeda threat to the Middle East including Israel into much sharper focus.
The thinking in Jerusalem is that since the Islamic theocrats did not scruple to give al Qaeda logistical backing from their towns for the May 12 string of suicide attacks against Riyadh, they will be as willing to help the same terrorists mount strikes against Israel. Tuesday, July 22, Tehran again denied granting the network’s leading lights sanctuary, contradicting President George W. Bush’s accusation the day before that Syria and Iran harbored and assisted terrorists. He also warned them they would be held accountable.
No one knows for sure if Iran’s al Qaeda “guests” are enjoying a comfortable form of detention or are preparing the next wave of terrorist attacks with local connivance. (See also earlier DEBKAfile story on this page.) The theory going round some circles in Washington is that Iran’s logistical aid in the Riyadh attacks was meant to hint to the US government at the extent of damage the Iranians are capable of causing US interests in Iraq and other parts of the Middle East if the heat is not reduced on the nuclear issue.
Israel is keeping a very close eye on the Jordanian-born terror master Mussab Zarqawi, who just before the Iraq War was assigned, according to Israeli security sources, with executing a 9/11-scale attack in Israel. Six months ago, Zarqawi was sighted several times in Damascus, Beirut and places in Western Europe. He always went back to Iran after what are believed to have been recruiting missions for the attack from among the al Qaeda group sheltering in southern Lebanon and operatives who infiltrated Israel and the West Bank.
Zarqawi could not have moved around south Lebanon without the knowledge and assent of Syrian army intelligence and the Iran-backed Hizballah.
There is nothing to say that Zarqawi back in Iran ever gave up preparing for his Israel assignment. If such an operation is indeed afoot, then the Iran-based al Qaeda would be a greater and more tangible threat to Israel than any semi-functioning Iranian missile.
US-Israel Postscript
DEBKAfile’s Washington sources disclose that President Bush’s accusations against Syria and Iran on Monday were also meant for the ears of Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon, who has been invited for talks in the White House on July 29. On Friday, July 25, the Palestinian prime minister Mahmoud Abbas will be received by the US president in Washington for the first time. He is coming with a shopping list, at the top of which is a demand that Israel free a large number of terrorists from its prisons, including terrorists “with blood on their hands” and Hamas and Jihad Islami members.
Sharon, limited by government decisions from setting the latter categories loose, sought to create a diversion by developing an independent peace channel to Damascus. By attacking Syria as a sponsor of terrorists, Bush effectively blocked Sharon’s ploy. The implication is that if the Israeli leader is not too squeamish to do business with hard-line regimes like that of Bashar Assad which harbor al Qaeda and Hamas and Jihad Islami command centers, it can certainly bring itself to make concessions to the non-terrorist Abbas and his interior minister Dahlan.
There are indications that the Bush administration is cross with Sharon for his Syrian initiative and, to make things worse, using a UN official, Middle East envoy Terje Roed-Larsen as his go-between. Bush has no great love for UN officials and even less for surprises, especially when they come from Sharon who until now worked in perfect harmony with the White House.
From the US capital, the Israeli prime minister is seen to be shutting out of his counsels his defense and foreign ministers, Shaul Mofaz and Silvan Shalom - both of whom he has found indiscreetly forthcoming to the media on government policy, and barricading himself behind a hard shell in readiness for his White House talks. Quite aside from the real concerns posed by al Qaeda in Iran, Syria and Lebanon, Bush advisers are intent on cracking the Israeli leader’s shell so as to bring him round to advancing the concessions on the list brought by Palestinian leaders.
Military Action
Against Iran ‘An Option’ for USA
![]()
Fri 20 Jun 2003
10:43am (UK)
By John Deane, Chief Political Correspondent, PA News
President George W Bush reserves the right to take military action against
Iran unless Tehran agrees to abandon efforts to develop nuclear weapons, a
leading member of the US administration said today.
John Bolton, Under-Secretary of State for Arms Control and International
Security, stressed that such action was very much a last resort but
insisted that Iran could not be allowed to develop a weapons capability
which could destabilise the whole region.
Interviewed on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme about the US’s diplomatic
efforts to get Tehran to abandon its weapons ambitions, Mr Bolton was
asked whether ultimately the US was reserving the right to take Iraq
war-style military action against Iran.
He replied: “The President has repeatedly said that all options are on the
table. But that is not only not our preference, it is far far from our
minds.”
But pressed on whether military action remained an option, he said: “It
has to be an option.
“Nuclear weapons are incredibly dangerous and when you couple the Iranian
nuclear programme with their aggressive efforts to expand the range of
their ballistic missiles, they are bringing more and more of our friends
and allies within range.
“It is one of the reasons we have pressed the Russians so hard and why
President Putin has fundamentally agreed that it cannot be in Russian
interests to have a nuclear-capable, ballistic missile-equipped Iran just
to its south.”
The Mujahedeen Khalq (Iranians)
'planned Europe attacks'
From correspondents in Paris
June 19, 2003
A LEADING
Iranian opposition group had planned attacks on Iranian diplomatic
missions in Europe and elsewhere, a top French intelligence chief said
today, explaining massive raids on the organisation a day earlier.
The head of the DST, France's counterintelligence agency, spoke at a news
conference after a day of protests outside DST headquarters by scores of
Mujahedeen Khalq members - three of whom set themselves afire. At least
two were severely burned.
The Mujahedeen Khalq "was preparing to commit attacks outside Iran, including in Europe", said DST chief Pierre de Bousquet de Florian.
However, Iranian diplomatic missions in France, where the group is headquartered, were not among sites targeted, he said.
The group, which opposes the clerical government in Tehran, is listed as a terrorist organisation by the United States and the European Union.
However, it had few problems during most of its time in France, where the group located shortly after Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution.
Of the 159 people detained in yesterday's raids, only 26 were still being held for questioning by the DST.
However, they included a highly symbolic figure, Maryam Rajavi, a leader and wife of Mujahedeen Khalq chief Massoud Rajavi.
Police seized between $US8 million ($12 million) and $US9 million ($13.5 million) in cash during the raids on 13 sites, Bousquet de Florian said, adding that the money - all in cash - had not been fully counted.
The main site raided was a walled compound in Auvers-Sur-Oise, north of Paris, that for years has served as headquarters for the Mujahedeen Khalq.
"They were making Auvers-Sur-Oise an operational centre for terrorism," the DST chief said.
Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy said yesterday the group planned to turn France into a rear base.
The counterintelligence chief linked the terror plans to the Mujahedeen Khalq's setback in Iraq - where it maintained a well-equipped army to mount attacks on neighbouring Iran.
The US-led war in Iraq "deprived (the Mujahedeen Khalq) of its Baghdad headquarters" and of financing by the regime of Saddam Hussein, Bousquet de Florian said. US forces in Iraq disarmed the Mujahedeen Khalq forces in May.
The DST chief said the Mujahedeen Khalq functions like a sect, with Maryam and Massoud Rajavi veritable cult figures.
He transmitted a message from Maryam Rajavi asking followers not to burn themselves up. "Mrs Rajavi is sensitive to these immolations," he said. "She doesn't want demonstrators to express themselves in this way."
At today's demonstration, a woman identified as Marzieh Babakhani, 42, doused herself with a flammable liquid and lit a match, according to police and the National Council of Resistance of Iran, the group's so-called parliament-in-exile.
She was rushed to the hospital after other protesters put out the flames. Police said she sustained injuries on her face and upper chest, and a passerby's arm was burned.
A spokesman for the Council, Shahin Gobadi, said the woman had died, but police denied that.
Several hours later, a protester identified as Sedigheh Mojaveri set herself ablaze and was also hospitalised in critical condition, police said.
A third protester - identified as a woman by police but as a man by the Mujahedeen Khalq - burned himself in the late afternoon. The protester's condition was unclear.
In Bern, Switzerland, a man in his 50s tried to set himself afire in front of the French Embassy, dousing himself with petrol, but was stopped by police.
Yesterday, a 38-year-old man in London set himself afire during a protest outside the French Embassy.
The crackdown on the Mujahedeen came as pro-democracy protesters in Iran put pressure on the clerical government with demonstrations calling for greater freedom.
Iranian President Mohammed Khatami praised the French action, and said the United States should follow suit.
"It is natural that we want all the people who have been involved in terrorist acts," he said in an apparent reference that Tehran would like their extradition. Khatami said "there are documents and evidence against them".
Yesterday's raids by 1,300 police were carried out based on intelligence indicating the group's "dangerous and illegal" activities, government spokesman Jean-Francois Cope said.
"Our services had specific information on the development of activities of this organisation," Cope said.
The Mujahedeen have been based in France since shortly after the 1979 Islamic revolution that toppled the Iranian monarchy and brought Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini to power.
The group had initially supported the revolution, but fell out over its advocacy of a secular regime. It has offices in several western cities.
Iranian caught with two passports at NAIA
By Sandy Araneta
The Philippine Star 06/17/2003 An Iranian national posing as a Portuguese
was arrested by Bureau of Immigration (BI) agents at the Ninoy Aquino
International Airport (NAIA) after the foreigner was found to have another
passport hidden in his underwear.
Ferdie Sampol, head supervisor of the BI-NAIA, identified the Iranian as
Hajy Hosseinbigi Hamidreza, with passport number C5754084.
The immigration bureau said the Iranian had initially presented a
Portuguese passport (H759348) that identified him as Ricardo Fernando. The
Iranian was arrested Sunday evening upon arrival from Singapore.
He was immediately taken to the immigration main office in Intramuros,
Manila.
In a report to Sampol, BI personnel said that at the immigration counter,
the Iranian presented his Portuguese passport, saying he would be flying
to Bangkok on June 26.
However, immigration agents had doubts as to the purpose of his visit in
Manila and tried to ask for his airline ticket from Singapore.
The Iranian said he had disposed of it while insisting he was a Portuguese
tourist.
He, however, had no hotel reservation in Bangkok and only $300 as pocket
money, which is quite uncommon for arriving tourists, immigration agents
said in their report.
Immigration agents then asked the Iranian to go inside their office for
further investigation.
There, immigration agents asked him to remove his clothes and later
discovered that the Iranian had his Iranian passport hidden in his
underwear.
The Iranian admitted that he took a flight from Iran to Singapore using
his real name. He planned to use Manila as a transit point using the fake
passport before he resumes his journey to Japan, which he claims was his
final destination.
No details were provided as to the purpose of his trip.
The Iranian was turned over to the chief of the BI Intelligence Division
at the main office for further investigation and disposition. The Iranian
has been blacklisted by the BI.
US Accumulates Evidence of Iran’s Nuclear Violations
DEBKAfile Special Report
June 16, 2003, 4:47 PM (GMT+02:00)
DEBKAfile’s Washington sources reveal that the Americans have turned up increasing indications that Iran is marching forward with its clandestine nuclear programs, which are the subject of the current International Atomic Energy Agency board meeting in Vienna on Monday and Tuesday, June 16 and 17. The board is examining evidence that the Iranians have secretly set up a massive uranium enrichment facility designed to house tens of thousands of centrifuges. This facility could support the production of weapons-grade uranium and plutonium.
To subscribe to DEBKA-Net-Weekly click HERE .
Washington will insist that the United Nations nuclear watchdog declare Iran to be in breach of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treat (NPT), which it has signed.
The IAEA chief Mohammed ElBaradei has already circulated a harsh report to board members, accusing Tehran of failing to give notice of certain nuclear material and activities. Inspection is hampered by Iran’s refusal sign the Additional Protocol which would grant international inspectors wider access and more intrusive, short-notice visits to suspected atomic sites. For example, Iran has denied ElBaradei’s request for inspection access to Kalaye Electric Company where parts for centrifuges are built in violation of the NPT.
Having Iran declared in serious breach of the NPT at the IAEA board meeting in Vienna would open the way for a United States complaint to the UN Security and the tabling of a resolution endorsing tough action against Iran.
Tehran, for its part, is employing dilatory tactics to block this move in order to buy extra time to complete its nuclear weapons program unhindered. Intelligence experts estimate that Iran will have developed a nuclear bomb and delivery-capable missiles by the end of 2004. To fend off mounting US pressure, the spokesman of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization to the IAEA took an aggressive tack: First give us access to nuclear technological data for civilian purposes and promise that our signature on the Additional Protocol will not interfere with our nuclear infrastructure development.
Iran’s posture against the US strikes a sympathetic chord in the European Union - with which Tehran is negotiating for a trade deal - raising the prospect of leaving Washington to go it alone in seeking international support for firm global action against Iran as happened in the case of Iraq. The ploy was borrowed from North Korea, who in the 1990s successfully persuaded the Clinton administration to part with the funds and technology for advanced nuclear reactors that later served Pyongyang for developing its nuclear program and its nuclear collaboration with Tehran.
DEBKA-Net-Weekly was the first publication on November 15, 2002 to expose Iran’s secret nuclear plants in Natanz and Arak. Both are supervised by the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization, a state body controlled by the National Security Council that defers only to Iran’s radical spiritual leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Natanz, where nuclear fuel (enriched uranium) is produced, is located 100 miles north of Isfahan on the old Natanz-Kashan highway. A huge facility, big enough to employed hundreds of workers, it is buried many feet underground and set in layers of concrete. The director of this site is an IAEO official called Dawood Agha-Jani.
The Arak facility produces heavy water at a place called Qatran Workshop close to the Qara-Chai River, three miles from Khondab in northern Azerbaijan. A second IAEO official, Daryoush Sheibani, heads this project.
Unfinished structures were left at both locations to support official claims that building is uncompleted and the sites are not active.
Wednesday, May 21, 2003
Rumsfeld: Al-Qaeda
Busy In Iran
May 21, 2003
The Daily Telegraph
From Correspondents In Washington
Senior al-Qaeda leaders were "busy" in Iran, the US Defence Secretary said today, amid reports that terrorist attacks in Saudi Arabia were directed by a small cell in Iran.
"Just from a factual standpoint there is no question but that there have been and are today senior al-Qaeda leaders in Iran and they are busy," Donald Rumsfeld said.
The New York Times cited Bush administration officials as saying that intercepted communications strongly suggested that a small cell of al-Qaeda leaders in Iran directed the May 12 suicide attacks in Riyadh, which killed 34 people.
The United States was sending a strong protest to Tehran, the report said.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Friday, May 23, 2003
Bush Weighs Effort To Undermine Iranian Leadership
May 22, 2003
Knight Ridder Newspapers
Warren P. Strobel
WASHINGTON - Prompted by evidence that Iran is harboring top al-Qaida operatives linked to last week's suicide bombings in Saudi Arabia and fears that Tehran may be closer to building a nuclear weapon than previously believed, the Bush administration has begun debating whether to take action to destabilize the Islamic republic, U.S. officials said Thursday.
Officials in Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's office are using both issues to press their view that the United States should adopt both overt and covert measures to undermine the Islamic regime in Tehran, said the officials, who are involved in the debate. Other officials argue that such a campaign would backfire by discrediting the moderate Iranians who are demanding political reforms.
Although one senior official engaged in the debate said "the military option is never off the table," others said no one was suggesting an invasion of Iran, although some officials think the United States should launch a limited air strike on Iran's nuclear weapons facilities if Iran appears on the verge of producing a nuclear weapon. By some estimates, Iran could have a nuclear weapon within two years.
Some Pentagon officials suggested using the remnants of an Iranian opposition group once backed by Saddam Hussein, the Mujahedeen Khalq (MEK), to instigate armed opposition to the Iranian government. U.S. military forces in Iraq have disarmed the roughly 6,000-strong MEK, which is on the State Department's list of foreign terrorist groups. But the group's weapons are in storage and it hasn't disbanded.
However, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice and other top officials rejected the idea, saying that while some might consider the MEK freedom fighters, "a terrorist is a terrorist is a terrorist," according to officials involved in the debate.
Bush has designated Iran a member of an "axis of evil," along with Iraq and North Korea. But until now, he's pursued a middle course with Iran, OK'ing talks on issues of common concern such as Afghanistan, while not attempting to re-establish diplomatic ties.
A formal statement of U.S. policy toward Iran, called a National Security Presidential Directive, has been on hold about a year because of internal administration debates and the war in Iraq, American officials said. The document is being resurrected, they said.
Bush's senior foreign-policy advisers were to have met at the White House on Thursday to discuss Iran policy, said a knowledgeable administration official, but the meeting was postponed until next week to give Iran several more days to meet U.S. demands that it turn over the suspected al-Qaida terrorists. If it doesn't, Washington is likely to react with harsher measures, the official said.
The United States has suspended a series of meetings between U.S. and Iranian diplomats in Geneva at which the two countries - which have no formal diplomatic relations - have been discussing terrorism, Afghanistan and Iraq.
The suspension followed intelligence data, including intercepted telephone calls, indicating that an al-Qaida cell based in Iran helped organize the bombings in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, which were apparently part of a larger al-Qaida plot that was partially foiled by Saudi authorities. The bombings killed 34 people, eight of them Americans.
The cell of 10 or so al-Qaida members is run by top al-Qaida operative Saif al Adel, who is third on the U.S. government's list of most-wanted al-Qaida leaders, following Osama bin Laden and his deputy Ayman al Zawahri.
"There's no question but that there have been and are today senior al-Qaida leaders in Iran, and they are busy," Rumsfeld said this week.
Iranian officials have denied harboring al-Qaida fugitives, and U.S. officials acknowledge that Iran has turned over some al-Qaida suspects to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and blocked others from entering its territory.
The senior U.S. intelligence official said it wasn't clear whether al Adel's group, which is believed to be in a remote area of southeastern Iran near the border with Pakistan, was operating with the acquiescence of at least part of the Iranian government.
Also driving the Bush administration's concern - as well as that of Israel - are revelations that Iran's nuclear weapons program may be far more advanced than previously believed.
Last summer, the MEK alleged that Iran was building a uranium enrichment plant near the city of Natanz, unknown to U.S. intelligence agencies.
The United States is pushing the International Atomic Energy Agency to declare Iran in violation of the 1968 nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei is due to issue a report on Iran on June 10.
The Bush administration will announce Friday that it's imposing sanctions on a Chinese firm, North China Industries, for transferring technology that aided Iran's ballistic missile program. The sanctions also will apply to an Iranian firm, the Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group.
Advocates of regime change want to bolster popular opposition in Iran to the religious leadership, which has used its supreme power to block much of President Mohammed Khatami's reform agenda and is despised by many Iranians.
Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., introduced legislation Monday that would expand pro-democracy broadcasting into Iran and commit the United States to backing an internationally monitored referendum allowing Iranians to change their government peacefully.
Flynt Leverett, a former White House and CIA official, said advocates of that approach overestimated the weakness of the Iranian government.
"I don't think the Iranian regime as a whole is a house of cards just ready to be pushed over," said Leverett, who's now at the Washington-based Brookings Institution's Saban Center for Middle East Policy.
It's particularly unlikely that a new government would be in place in Tehran in time to address U.S. concerns over Iran's nuclear weapons program and similar issues, Leverett said.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Friday, May 23, 2003
The Road To A Nuclear Iran
May 23, 2003
The Jerusalem Post
Caroline Glick
As the world's media and foreign ministries have again trained their sights in on Israel and the Palestinians, a much more significant drama is being largely underplayed.
At its meeting next month in Vienna, the International Atomic Energy Agency will address the recent confirmation of reports that Iran is now poised to produce nuclear weapons.
Since a consortium of Russian companies signed an $800 million deal in 1996 to build a 1,000-megawatt light water nuclear reactor for Iran in Bushehr, most efforts by the US and Israel to stop the Iranian nuclear program have centered around applying pressure on the Russian government.
"The Iranians learned from Iraqi mistakes," says a senior Israeli intelligence official who is involved in efforts to monitor the Iranian nuclear program.
"The Iraqis worked 80 percent in secret and 20 percent in public on their nuclear program. This attracted attention to the program and made it possible to take action to prevent them from moving forward.
"In contrast," he says, "Iran works 80 percent in public and 20 percent in secret in developing its nuclear weapons program. It moves forward publicly, lulling the international community into a sense of complacency that all the Iranians are building is a nuclear power plant. Then suddenly we discover that they are on the verge of producing nuclear bombs."
Last August, an Iranian rebel group, the National Council of Resistance of Iran, showed that the Bushehr plant might very well be little more than a sideshow to the real Iranian nuclear program. The group's disclosure, which was later substantiated by satellite imagery, indicated that Iran secretly developed two other nuclear sites in Natanz and Arak. The Natanz plant is used for the production of nuclear fuel, and the Arak facility is used for the production of heavy water. While Russian companies have been under constant Western intelligence surveillance, it appears that these two facilities have been built with intense and little noted Chinese, Pakistani, and North Korean assistance.
When satellite images taken after the group's disclosure backed up the allegations, IAEA director Muhammad el-Baradei requested permission from the Iranian government to inspect the sites last December. In what is itself a violation of the Nonproliferation Treaty, (NPT) of which Iran is a signatory, the Iranian government delayed the inspection until February.
The IAEA's inspections were limited to the Natanz facility due to Baradei's tight schedule. Visiting the Natanz plant, Baradei and his inspectors found a network of centrifuges for enriching uranium. At the time Baradei indicated that a pilot facility at the site was complete and that a large centrifuge enrichment plant was still under construction. He described the plant as sophisticated and comprehensive.
Reports have noted that the Natanz facility already has 160 operational centrifuges and that an additional 1,000 are set for production in the next 18 months.
If left to their own devices, with the enriched uranium produced by these centrifuges, by 2005 the Iranian government will be able to field several uranium-based nuclear weapons every year. The still uninspected heavy-water plant in Arak will presumably be capable of producing plutonium-based nuclear weapons.
For their part, the Russians appear to be cooperating in the attempt to rein in the Iranians. Although they refuse to curtail their involvement with the Bushehr reactor, they have conditioned the operation of the Bushehr plant on Iranian agreement that the spent fuel rods from the reactor, which can be used to produce enriched plutonium, be returned to Russia. The Iranians have refused to sign on to the Russian proposal and as a result, although complete, the Bushehr plant is not operational.
As MK Yuval Steinitz, chairman of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, notes, "The Iranian nuclear program is of course a strategic threat to Israel, but it is far from being only Israel's problem. The Iranians are now enhancing their ballistic missile capabilities to cover not only Israel but targets throughout Europe. A nuclear armed Iran, capable not only of bombing Israel, but of bombing Europe, will be a force of global instability and will significantly change the global balance of power."
As with every other significant national security and foreign policy issue, the Bush administration is divided on how to deal with the Iranian nuclear threat. Hawks in the Pentagon are pushing for the US to force the IAEA to find Iran in material breach of the NPT at its meeting next month. Such a finding would open the Iranian nuclear program to UN Security Council scrutiny that could lead to UN-sanctioned military action similar to the actions taken by the Security Council against Iraq in 1990. At the very least, it could have salutary effects on the US's thus far unsuccessful bid to force Europe to cut economic ties with the mullocracy.
For its part, the State Department, as usual has recommended traveling a less contentious path that involves "engaging" the Iranian government in an "unofficial" dialogue that has been taking place over the past several months in Geneva under UN supervision. At these meetings, the Iranian officials have denied that they are pursuing nuclear weapons just as they refused to accept that Hizbullah is a terrorist organization, denied supporting terrorism, and pretended they are not harboring al-Qaida commanders. That is, these unofficial negotiations with the Iranians, which as recently as early this month the State Department recommended making official, have been characterized by complete Iranian duplicity.
At the same time, by soft-pedaling the Iranian threat, the State Department is paving the way for a failure at the IAEA meeting next month. Speaking to Reuters, a Western diplomatic official in Vienna said last week that Baradei is expected merely to note that there are "inconsistencies" in the Iranian nuclear program that need to be explained.
In an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal this week, former FBI director Louis Freeh addressed the issue of the Iranian threat to US national security. Calling Hizbullah, "the exclusive terrorist agent of the Islamic Republic of Iran," he criticized the Clinton administration for refusing to apply pressure on Iran after the FBI found that its security services stood behind the 1996 Hizbullah bombing of the Khobar Towers in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, where 19 US airmen were killed. Then, too, the US has accused Teheran of sheltering top al-Qaida terrorists like Said Adel, the network's security chief, and Osama bin Laden's son Saad. Washington further alleges that al-Qaida operatives in Iran directed the May 12 terror attacks against US targets in Riyadh in which 34 people were murdered.
In addition to Hizbullah and al-Qaida, the Iranians also control the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, finance Hamas, and since the Karine-A weapons sale to the PA was concluded in late 2001, Iranian intelligence authorities have been backing and instructing Fatah terror cells as well.
In the aftermath of the May 12 attacks, the State Department suspended its dialogue with the Iranian government and raised its rhetoric against the Iranian regime. And yet, in spite of the clear strategic threat posed by a nuclear armed Iran, the State Department has been spending its energy not playing up the IAEA meeting next month, but in pressuring Israel to accept its road map to establish a Palestinian state by 2005 just in time for the Iranians to declare that they are vacating their signature to the NPT and possess a nuclear arsenal capable of hitting targets in Israel and Europe.
In a conversation with Prime Minister Ariel Sharon earlier in the week, US President George W. Bush reportedly said he is convinced that PA Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas is committed to reforming the PA and fighting terrorism. And yet, the day after this conversation, Abbas himself told the Egyptian press that as far as he is concerned, PA Chairman Yasser Arafat, and not he, remains the head of the PA.
In Abbas's words, "Arafat is at the top of the [Palestinian] Authority. He's the man to whom we refer, regardless of the American or Israeli view of him." As well, both Abbas and his new foreign minister, Arafat lackey Nabil Shaath, have gone on record stating that Abbas's government will not take any action against Palestinian terrorist cells.
In an article in The Atlantic Monthly published in August 1992, Robert Kaplan discussed how it came to pass that the US government was caught unawares when Saddam Hussein marched his army into Kuwait in August 1990. By Kaplan's telling, after the Iraq-Iran war ended in 1988, US policy regarding Saddam became vague. With little direction from the White House, Saddam's 1988 gassing of 5,000 Kurds met with little backlash from Washington, as Arabists in the State Department were given more or less free rein regarding US policy towards Iraq. These career Arabists, like then ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie argued that Saddam, while a dictator, had a pro-Western orientation.
As Kaplan noted, "The only Middle East issue that really energized [US secretary of state James] Baker was the one with a domestic political payoff: the Arab-Israeli question." Together with his senior policy aides Dennis Ross and Dan Kurtzer, Baker poured all his energy and leverage into pressuring then prime minister Yitzhak Shamir's government to open negotiations with PLO-backed Palestinians.
Acting in this manner, Baker failed to take note of what Saddam was planning for Kuwait. This, in spite of the fact that in April 1990, four months before the invasion, Chas Freeman, then US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, warned specifically that Saddam was likely to invade Kuwait.
For anyone with eyes to see, it is clear that Abbas's ascension to power in the PA is a farce. The new wave of massacres in Israel and Abbas's declared allegiance to Arafat and Hamas are simply expressions of the obvious: Abbas is not a trustworthy interlocutor and by supporting his sham of reform, the US is supporting the terrorist organizations murdering Israelis as well as their state supporters in Teheran.
There is an old joke about a man groping around on the street at night. His friend approaches him and asks him what he is doing.
"I'm looking for my keys," he responds.
"Did you drop them here?" his friend asks.
"No, I dropped them in the alley across the way. But there's no light in the alley, so I'm looking for them here."
The prime danger to US national security lies in Teheran. The key to the global Islamic terror nexus that stretches across the world is found in the dark allies of Teheran, not in the well lit streets of Jerusalem. Rather than pressuring an ally to reward Teheran's terrorist friends, the US should be using all its leverage throughout the world to prevent the ayatollahs from acquiring nuclear weapons.
The price the US paid in 1990 for ignoring Saddam Hussein in favor of pressuring Israel was the Gulf War. The price it will pay for repeating the mistake with Iran will be a nuclear nightmare.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Iran's Secret Nuclear Sites
Aug 16
John Lumpkin in Washington, AP
Members of an Iranian rebel group claimed
Iran's Government was building at least two secret sites to support its
nuclear weapons program.
Citing sources inside the Iranian Government, officials with the National Council of Resistance of Iran said the sites were a nuclear fuel production plant and research lab at Natanz and a heavy water production plant at Arak.
Both sites are in central Iran, south of the capital, Tehran.
"These two nuclear sites have been kept secret until now," Alireza Jafarzadeh, the US representative of the organisation, said at a press conference.
Both sites were close to completion, Mr Jafarzadeh said.
Heavy water from the Arak plant could support reactors capable of producing material for nuclear weapons, he said.
US officials familiar with the rebels' charges declined to comment on the specifics of their claims. However, the officials acknowledged Iran was moving forward with its clandestine nuclear weapons program.
Earlier this year, CIA Director George Tenet said US intelligence was worried countries such as Iran may make "sudden leaps" in their nuclear programs.
"Tehran may be able to indigenously produce enough fissile material for a nuclear weapon by late this decade," Mr Tenet told a congressional committee in March.
Much of the public attention given to Iran's nuclear effort focuses on a power reactor at Bushehr, which is being built with Russian assistance.
But its design and international oversight agreements are expected to prevent it being used to make material for nuclear weapons.
Instead, the main concern about it is that it will lead to more expertise in nuclear matters in Iran, benefiting its weapons program, US officials say. Mr Jafarzadeh's Paris-based group is a government-in-exile that backs violent overthrow of the ruling religious Government.
Officials say they want to install a democratic government in Iran that protects human rights.
The group has been labelled a terrorist organisation by the US State Department, but that didn't prevent it meeting the press in a posh Washington hotel two blocks from the White House yesterday.
The State Department accuses the group, also called People's Mujahideen or Mujahideen-e Khalq, of having Marxist sympathies and of killing several Americans in Iran in the 1970s; but some experts attribute the killings to a splinter faction.
It also receives support from the Iraqi Government of Saddam Hussein, an enemy of the Government of Iran, said the State Department, which also said both Iraq and Iran are supporters of terrorism.


Annotated Satellite Images of
Iranian Nuclear Facilities
![]() |
|||
| Images will open in new window | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Arak -- Overview | Arak -- Close-up | Natanz -- Overview | Natanz -- Close-up |
Proud HomeSite of
The largest Military Webring in the World!

Last Updated: Tuesday, July 01, 2008
|
Disclaimer:We cannot be responsible for content or representations found on individual web sites, services, search engines, personal statements, e-mail contacts, or content of any material related to the Internet. This site and service is provided at the USER'S DISCRETION only. The AV Hub/USA-GUNS/ACTIVE-DUTY copyright 1998-99, The Neely Network - all rights reserved. |