Force Protection Produced Buffalo and Cougar Combat Support Vehicles Active Duty Military Army Navy Air Force Marines Coast Guard Reserves Veterans
|
Active
Duty Last updated: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 |




Author: W. Thomas Smith Jr.
Publisher: The Washington Times
Date: 08/29/2005
Website:
http://washingtontimes.com/national/20050829-122510-4535r.htm
COLUMBIA, S.C. -- When U.S. Army Sgt. 1st Class Keith Kempke returns to Iraq
to find and destroy land mines and improvised explosive devices, he'll be
supported by a growing fleet of new armored vehicles such as the Buffalo and
the Cougar.
He's already seen them in action.
"I saw the Buffalo going down Iraq's Highway 1, which is normally where IEDs
are planted," said Sgt. Kempke, who has been training soldiers for
bomb-disposal work at Camp Dawson, W.Va., since returning from Iraq last
year. "That giant armored beast is no doubt saving lives."
Indeed, what has been referred to as a "Humvee on steroids," the Buffalo is
a 24-ton mine-protective, countermine/IED vehicle with a long grappling arm
that faces down bombs, removes them and withstands terrific blasts without
harm to its passengers.
"It's done so perhaps thousands of times," said Mike Aldrich, vice president
of sales and marketing for Ladson, S.C.-based Force Protection Inc., which
manufactures the big Buffalo and its little brother, the 13- to 19-ton
(depending on its individual configuration) Cougar. "We've only had one
broken wrist in two years."
Force Protection is under a $91 million contract to build its mine-protected
vehicles for the Defense Department. About 100 Buffalos and Cougars are
already overseas. That number is slated to double by February 2006.
"By the end of the first quarter of 2006, we will be producing two Cougars a
day. Once we hit that number, we can quickly move to four if we have the
orders," Mr. Aldrich said.
What makes these vehicles "mine-protected" is the V-shaped hull design,
similar to that of a boat.
"The force of a mine blast is diverted away from the vehicle, basically
splitting that energy to the right or the left rather than having the
vehicle absorb the blast, being lifted off the ground and killing the
passengers," said Force Protection spokesman Jeff Child.
Force Protection is not the only manufacturer of mine-protected vehicles,
but it is the only American-based company producing them in the U.S. and
shipping them to Iraq and Afghanistan. Other companies include General
Dynamics, which manufactures the RG-31 in South Africa, and Textron Systems,
which produces the German-made Dingo 2.
The generation of armored vehicles developed by Force Protection and its
competitors are based on the design of the older South African
mine-protected vehicles such as the RG-31 and the Casspir, still in use, but
also a symbol of that nation's apartheid struggle.
Many Americans have questioned why U.S. forces did not have adequate armor
going into Iraq. Mr. Aldrich said the answer may be found in the post-Cold
War military's moving toward a faster, more flexible, strike force.
"I believe the Army thought that increased armor conflicted with that
objective," he said. "It was believed that up-armored Humvees would be
sufficient to handle land mines and IEDs.
"But there is no way a flat-bottomed, 6-ton, up-armored Humvee is going to
stay on the ground and protect people adequately against the current
threat," he said.
The new vehicles are both heavily armored and fast.
"They can sprint 60 to 65 miles per hour," Mr. Aldrich said. "They can go
for hours at 55 miles per hour. They are as mobile as anything else in the
current [operating] environment. And they provide much greater protection
for our troops."
So why weren't the vehicles put on the fast track once it was realized how
great the IED threat was?
"I'm not sure that is an accurate assessment," said Lawrence J. Nee, chief
of the countermine division of the Army's Close Combat Systems. "We've been
in production and procurement of the Buffalo since 2002."
Despite their protective capabilities, the Buffalo and the Cougar are not
designed to replace the "up-armored" Humvee. They can and have supplemented
Humvees in urban operations, but the new vehicles' sizes don't afford them
the same off-road capabilities of the Humvee.
Force Protection is developing a Humvee replacement, yet to be officially
announced. Its prototype is known as the Lion. It could hit the ground in
early 2007.
Force Protection also is involved in blast-protection research and
development, as are various Defense agencies.
The Office of Naval Research (ONR), for instance, is developing an Ultra
Armored Patrol vehicle (with similar hull-design characteristics) for
testing purposes. "It is not being built as a Humvee replacement, but as a
concept vehicle to test out various technologies," said Daniel S. Dayton,
director of corporate communications at the ONR.
"One of the project's goals is to develop a prototype vehicle that
demonstrates improved ballistic and mine protection technologies," he said.
"An innovative survivable crew capsule, which utilizes new armor recipes, is
mounted on a commercial truck chassis. Faceted crew capsule geometries are
being tested as well."
Proud Home Site of
The largest Military Webring in the World!

|
Disclaimer:We cannot be responsible for content or representations found on individual web sites, services, search engines, personal statements, e-mail contacts, or content of any material related to the Internet. This site and service is provided at the USER'S DISCRETION only. The AV Hub/USA-GUNS/ACTIVE-DUTY copyright 1998-99, The Neely Network - all rights reserved. |